Is wood a sustainable source of energy?
Is wood the greatest untapped
source of renewable energy in
North America?
Dan Henry of Hearth & Home
Technologies believes the answer
to that question is a big 'yes'
and he made an impressive case
for wood pellet fuel at the 2009
Sustainable Energy Expo. His
bold statement...
According to the U.S. Forest
Service there are approximately
360 million dry tons of wood
available annually in the U.S. A
typical home requires 3 tons for
heating. "That means we could
heat 100 millions homes in our
country."
This is not a new technology.
There are currently 1 million
homes heated by wood pellets, a
product made from wood and wood
scraps. The wood fiber is
compressed into small pellets
that resemble hamster food,
making it easy to deliver. But
these little pellets pack a big
BTU punch (about 350,000 BTU's
per cubic foot).
According to the Pellet
Fuels Institute, that makes
the fuel comparable to gasoline
in terms of its efficiency to
deliver heat (about twice the
efficiency of ethanol).
Wood pellet technology is
interesting in that it is one of
the few renewable sources of
"clean" energy (in quotes
because wood burning is only
clean if highly controlled) that
specifically addresses U.S. heating needs.

For the most part, heating
technologies on display at
events like the Sustainable
Energy Expo (where
I shot this video of Dan Henry)
tend toward efficiency --
preheating air or water using
solar, more efficiency furnaces,
on-demand water heaters, etc.
All of these are great and can
significantly reduce our heating
demand, but right now most all
of our fuel stocks are
non-renewable -- gas, oil, and
propane.
Rarely do you see a technology
that addresses the actual fuel
stock for heating. In the U.S.
heating of homes accounts for
about 40% of total home energy
consumption (electricity is
about 60%). No matter how many
solar panels or wind farms we
get, these clean technologies
will never address our massive
need for heating fuel.
But if we were to begin to use
our forests as a source of fuel
many questions arise,
I think, about our ability to
manage those forests
sustainably. Yes, I agree forest
fires are not a good thing (they
are part of nature, but we just
can't afford to have such
massive CO2 dumps given our
current over-carbonized
atmosphere). And I do think the
clearing of timber for
firebreaks could indeed be an
excellent source of fuel.
But I wonder how quickly the
"sustainable management" of a
forest would get reduced to
privatized land rush for the
next great heating fuel. If we
treated our trees the way we
treat our oil, it's difficult to
imagine that the forests could
remain in tact for very long.
