Some people have decided the refrigerator is absurd and wasteful
No appliance seems more absurd in
Some people have decided the refrigerator is absurd and wasteful enough that they've decided to give up on it entirely. And not just in
“It seems wasteful to me to use even an Energy Star-rated fridge, because I’m getting along fine without one,” Rachel Muston, a Canadian government worker in
People who aren't ready to give up a refrigerator can still make a dent in their carbon footprint by replacing an old one. The refrigerator works day and night to keep food cool, but according to the National Resources Defense Council, it may do more than any other appliance to keep the planet hot.
New refrigerators use about 75 percent less energy than refrigerators manufactured in the 1970s, according to the NRDC. They use 40 percent less than those manufactured in 2000, before the
Homeowners trying to help the environment by replacing old power-hungry appliances have been puzzled by the same question that has hampered efforts to build energy-saving homes and develop cleaner biofuels — whether the “embodied energy” required to manufacture and deliver an innovation outweighs the energy it saves.
Refrigerators represent a lot of embodied energy — one expert estimates that 20 percent of a refrigerator’s carbon emission occurs during manufacture and delivery, before a consumer ever plugs it in. But even that more complicated calculus has improved in recent years. A study published in Appliance magazine in 2006 shows that a refrigerator manufactured in 2005 uses 78 percent less energy in its entire lifetime, including manufacture and delivery, than one manufactured in 1990. Refrigerators typically last 15 to 25 years, promising net carbon savings in the long run.
The financial savings are easier to calculate. The NRDC estimates a new Energy Star refrigerator can save consumers $100 a year if it replaces a "vintage model" from the 1980s.
ARE YOU A CONTRACTOR?
CHECK HERE
